My PhD plans: Part 1: a new ichthyosaur


Well, having given a presentation on the plans for my PhD, I feel as though I can now share it with the world.  That and I’ve had agreement on what I plan to do and how I plan to do.  Thus, here is an edited pseudo-transcript (mostly made up) on my PhD plans for the next year or so.  This will be in the form of three posts:

My thesis is based upon an unpublished thesis of Angela Kirton (1983).  As it stands, it is currently divided into two main projects.  These will certainly lead on to several further projects.  The initial part is to redescribe the three genera (group of species) of Late Jurassic ichthyosaurs from Great Britain.  Concurrent with this, I will be comparing the three main phylogenetic analyses from 1999a (Motani) and 2000 (Maisch and Matzke; Sander).

Summary

As these posts will be quite long, I will put a small summary at the beginning of each.  This way you can get the gist and come back to the details later.

The first part of my PhD will be to describe the three genera of Late Jurassic ichthyosaurs from Britain:

    • Ophthalmosaurus
    • Brachypterygius
    • Nannopterygius
  • These can be identified based upon features of the skull and forelimb:
    • Ophthalmosaurus has a very large eye
    • Brachypterygius has three equal-sized facets on the humerus
    • Nannopterygius has very tiny paddles

Ichthyosaur basics

[Specimen abbreviations: BMNH—Natural History Museum, London (originally British Museum (Natural History))]

There are a few small things that I must clear up and add from my ‘Introduction to ichthyosaurs’ blog.  Firstly, how we describe different parts of vertebrates, and where the features of interest are (fig. 1).

The front of the animal (where the head is) is called anterior.  The rear, or tail end, is posterior: your hands are anterior to your legs.  The belly-side is ventral whereas the back is dorsal: your spine is dorsal to your belly button.  Each side is called the right or left lateral side: your right hand is on the right lateral side.  Closer to the body is proximal whereas distal is farther: your hand is distal to your elbow.

Fig. 1 Reconstruction of Ophthalmosaurus icenicus (length about 3.3 m; modified from Kirton 1983).

The ichthyosaurs that I am looking at show different features of the skull and paddle.  In the skull, the size of the eye is the most obvious difference.  The forepaddle (arm) varies in relative size, as do the number and size of the distal facets (concave faces) on the humerus (fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Right forepaddle of Ophthalmosaurus icenicus from the Oxford Clay of Peterborough (BMNH R3702; length about 650 mm) in dorsal view. Note the three facets on the distal end of the humerus and the large number of digits (arab numerals) and phalanges (roman numerals). The anterior- and posteriormost digits are accessory digits (modified from Kirton 1983).

Ichthyosaurs can have many digits (fingers) and phalanges (finger bones).  Humans have five digits on each hand, each with three phalanges (the thumb has two).  Some ichthyosaurs could have eight digits, each with over 20 phalanges.  Oddly enough, these are not all the same as our five fingers.  Ophthalmosaurus (fig. 2) has six digits and up to nine phalanges on each.  The middle four digits (fig. 2, numbered) are analogous to ours.  However, the other two are ‘accessory digits’ from different origins.  These definitions will be important in describing the ichthyosaurs below.

British Upper Jurassic ichthyosaurs

The three ichthyosaur genera from the British Late Jurassic are: Ophthalmosaurus, Brachypterygius and Nannopterygius.  I will give the most visible differences of these.

Ophthalmosaurus (oph-THAL-mo-SORE-us) is found in the Oxford Clay of the Callovian and Oxfordian stages (~162–~155 Ma).  Some possible remains are from the Kimmeridgian Stage (~155.6–150.8 Ma).  As the name suggests, this ichthyosaur is famous for having a large eye (‘ophthalmo-’ is from the Latin for eye; fig. 3).  It is the largest eye compared to body size known (Motani 1999b)!  The humerus has three distal facets.  These articulate with the pre-axial accessory digit, the radius and the ulna (Seeley 1874; Kirton 1983; McGowan and Motani 2003).  The anterior facet is the smallest.  The posteriormost is oblique to the other two.


Fig. 3 Skull of Ophthalmosaurus icenicus showing the very large orbit, where the eye sits (based upon BMNH R3893 & R 4753; length about 800 mm). The ring of bones (sclerotic ring) would have kept the shape of the eye and assisted in focussing underwater. Modified from McGowan and Motani (2003).

Ophthalmosaurus icenicus, the single British species, is the most common Late Jurassic ichthyosaur.  Many specimens have been found near Peterborough, collected by the Leeds brothers in the last half of the 19th Century.  The Leeds’ Collection was largely donated to the Natural History Museum in London, but parts went to museums around the UK.

Brachyterygius (BRACK-ip-ter-I-gi-us) is known from the Kimmeridgian (~155.6–150.8 Ma) of Dorset but there are also some possible finds from the Purbeck Beds (Lower Cretaceous, ~143 Ma) (Ensom et al. 2009) and even later (Lydekker 1888; McGowan and Motani 2003).  This genus was originally described from a forepaddle (fig. 4).  Brachypterygius’s paddle also has three distal facets on the humerus, each is subequally sized and oblique to each other (McGowan 1997).  These facets articulate (anterior to posterior) with the radius, (unusually) intermedium and ulna.  As with Ophthalmosaurus there are four digits with one pre- and one post-axial accessory digit.

Fig. 4 Brachypterygius extremes forepaddle showing the three equally sized distal humeral facets articulating with the radius, intermedium and ulna. Specimen BMNH R3177 (length about 400 mm; modified from Kirton 1983).

A skull in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge, described as Grendelius, was suggested to be Brachypterygius.  This was confirmed by a specimen in Bristol Museum.  This whole body specimen posses the skull of Grendelius with the forepaddle of Brachypterygius (McGowan 1997).  Because of this, Grendelius was renamed Brachypterygius (the earlier name gets precedence).  There are two species of Brachypterygius from the British Late Jurassic: B. extremus (the original) and B. mordax (originally Grendelius; McGowan 1997).

Nannopterygius (NAN-op-ter-I-gi-us) is the most uncommon, and unusual, of British Late Jurassic ichthyosaurs.  Only one whole body specimen, and one forepaddle, is known.  As the ‘nanno-’ in the name suggests, there is something small on this ichthyosaur: the paddles (see fig. 5; Hulke 1871).  Nannopterygius has significantly reduced fore- and hindpaddles (McGowan and Motani 2003).  These contain less than half the number of bones of other ichthyosaurs.  The humerus of Nannopterygius is also different from Ophthalmosaurus and Brachypterygius: it has only two distal facets.  These articulate with the radius and ulna (McGowan and Motani 2003).  The single British species, Nannopterygius enthekiodon, is from the Kimmeridgian of Kimmeridge Bay, Dorset (Hulke 1871).


Fig. 5 Nannopterygius enthekiodon from the Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset (specimen BMNH 46497; length about 3.5 m). Note the very small paddles compared to the rest of the body. Modified from McGowan and Motani (2003).

Rationale

Whereas Ophthalmosaurus has a lot of material available, Brachypterygius and Nannopterygius are known from only a few good specimens each.  These were described when first found, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but briefly, and have escaped extended descriptions since.  The largest recent work was done by Angela Kirton (1983) in her PhD thesis but is unpublished.  The recent surge in ichthyosaur interest, particularly in this millennium, has meant that the need for definite and accurate descriptions has increased.  This is especially important for conducting phylogenetic analyses, which is what I will talk about in my next post.

References

ENSOM, P. C., CLEMENTS, R. G., FEIST-BURKHARDT, S., MILNER, A. R., CHITOLIE, J., JEFFERY, P. A. and JONES, C. 2009. The age and identity of an ichthyosaur reputedly from the Purbeck Limestone Group, Lower Cretaceous, Dorset, southern England. Cretaceous Research, 30, 699–709.

HULKE, J. W. 1871. Note on an Ichthyosaurus (I. enthekiodon) from Kimmeridge Bay, Dorset. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 27, 440–441.

KIRTON, A. M. 1983. A review of British Upper Jurassic ichthyosaurs. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 239 pp.

LYDEKKER, R. 1888. Note on the classification of the Ichthyopterygia (with a notice of two new species). Geological Magazine, 5, 309–313.

MAISCH, M. W. and MATZKE, A. T. 2000. The Ichthyosauria. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 298, 1–160.

MCGOWAN, C. 1997. The taxonomic status of Grendelius mordax: a preliminary report. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17, 428–430.

MCGOWAN, C. and MOTANI, R. 2003. Ichthyopterygia. In SUES, H.-D. (ed.) Handbook of Paleoherpetology, Vol. 8. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, 175 pp.

MOTANI, R. 1999a. Phylogeny of the Ichthyopterygia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 19, 473–496.

MOTANI, R. 1999b. Large eyeballs in diving ichthyosaurs. Nature, 402, 747.

SANDER, P. M. 2000. Ichthyosauria: their diversity, distribution, and phylogeny. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74, 1–35.

SEELEY, H. G. 1874. On the pectoral arch and fore limb of Ophthalmosaurus, a new ichthyosaurian genus from the Oxford Clay. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 30, 696–707

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “My PhD plans: Part 1: a new ichthyosaur

  1. Hi Benjamin
    Your blog is great!
    I am graduate student from the Natural History Museum at the University of Oslo, descibing a new species of Upper Jurassic ichthyosaur from Svalbard and comparing it to Upper Jurassic ichthyosaurs from the UK. Would love to hear more about your work, contact me if you would like to hear more about Svalbards ichthyosaurs. We have an exciting collection here. =)
    Aubrey
    email: aubreyjr@student.bio.uio.no

  2. Hi Benjamin

    Great to see the work that you are doing and all the detailed information you’re putting on this blog.

    Re. Kirton’s drawing of the Ophthalmosaurus paddle, I believe this is based on specimen R3702. This has been figured by Andrews and appears in a photo in Motani’s orange bible with a different arrangement of phalanges in each case. Kirton states that R3702 consists of complete right and left paddles. Andrews shows a paddle with far fewer phalanges in fig. 37 of his descriptive catalogue and states this is ‘one of the best specimens carefully mounted by Mr. Leeds as found in the rock …’ Although I appreciate that the number of phalanges is probably somewhat variable I think it would be worthwhile re-examining R3702 to see whether phalanges from both paddles have been included in the drawing of the specimen as figured by Kirton. I don’t know whether paddle material from R3702 is included in the famous mounted O. in the main hall at the BM but the flippers on that chimera seem to have fewer finger bones.

    Paul

    1. Paul,

      Thank you for you comment.

      Re. R3702, Kirton did say it was part of the mounted skeleton (in the caption to her whole body reconstruction, fig.35). Motani, in the ‘orange bible’ (wonderful name which I must steal) states ‘not on mounted skeleton’ in pl.17 caption. Whether this means permanently or just for that photo I do not know. The problem phalangeal number is the preservation quality, as they are easily lost; many other paddles have nowhere near the same number as R3702. However, it wouldn’t surprise me if sharing of phalanges had occurred; examples of similar have happened. I plan to go to London possibly within the next month and so will check this out. There are a few paddle specimens there for me to compare.

      Thanks for the heads up, and hope you continue to enjoy the blog.

      Ben

  3. Ben

    Thanks for your observations and all the info. Agree with all you say. It will be very interesting to see what you find out. Please keep us posted.

    Paul

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s